Why Medical Practices Are Complaining About Kareo/Tebra: A Deep Dive Into User Reviews
In 2021, two widely used healthcare platforms, Kareo and PatientPop, merged and rebranded as Tebra. Tebra serves roughly 42,000 practices across the United States. The merger and creation of Tebra promised to streamline both clinical operations and practice growth into one, unified platform.
However, user reviews reveal major gaps between expectations and real-world performance. While the promise of fewer systems to manage, tighter integrations and enhanced operational efficiency felt like a game-changer for many practices, the reality highlights genuine issues you should know about.
Understanding real healthcare software complaints helps practices make more informed decisions about management software like Kareo/Tebra.
This analysis will cover actual feedback and verified reviews from real users across multiple platforms. We aim to provide an honest assessment, revealing genuine Kareo/Tebra complaints based on documented user experiences.
The Merger Effect: When Kareo Became Tebra
Before 2021, Kareo and PatientPop operated independently. The former was best known for its EHR, practice management and medical billing tools. Meanwhile, the latter was a popular platform for marketing, website development and patient acquisition. The two platforms officially merged in 2021 and rebranded as Tebra, combining patient management, billing and patient engagement into a single, end-to-end platform.
On paper, the merger made sense. Unfortunately, users frequently suggest that the transition created instability rather than improvement. Many report that the new instability negatively impacted practice workflows, citing system changes, new processes and unexpected feature limitations.
In verified feedback, one user mentioned a notable decline after the merge, noting they were "bought out twice," which resulted in greater instability. Some users also reported how they loved Kareo before Tebra took over, but experienced substantial problems after the transition.
One specific complaint mentioned in Tebra reviews is the visual changes. The shift in overall format and color schemes made the adjustment more difficult for users who relied heavily on color for navigation.
Customer Service Complaints Dominate User Reviews
The Kareo/Tebra complaints go beyond instability and design changes. Tebra customer service issues are a common thread in verified reviews. Many practices report that reaching support staff has become more difficult since the transition to Tebra, with one review specifically noting this was not the case early on.
Common concerns include lengthy wait times of 25 to 40 minutes to reach a customer service specialist, only to be brushed off or redirected without a resolution. Users also describe limited transparency about enrollment processes and difficulty getting answers for more complex issues. Tebra support staff reportedly sticks to the basics, which is presenting problems for practices.
Tebra customer service issues and poor EHR customer support even reached the Better Business Bureau (BBB). There are BBB complaints about delayed responses, lackluster communication and a general lack of accountability and responsibility.
One practice mentioned waiting two weeks for simple cost information during a critical transition period. These complaints are a stark contrast to early experiences with Kareo. Many users note that, before the merge, Kareo EHR customer support was knowledgeable and quick to fix issues.
Response Time Issues and Support Quality Concerns
Users frequently cite lengthy response times as a major frustration when working with Tebra customer support members. Several Tebra reviews mention that practices have to wait several weeks for a response, leaving staff without guidance during time-sensitive operational issues. In one review, the user noted that a support operator acknowledged the team was 8 to 9 days behind in responding to requests within the system.
While the company has offices in California, the support team appears to be offshore in Costa Rica. That offshore support reportedly takes over a week or more to respond to website changes. But that's not all.
As if those delays weren't enough, some reviews go into detail about the shocking responses they receive. Complaints mentioned being told to "figure it out yourself" or "suck it up." Longtime users state that support no longer pays attention to reported bugs, ignoring them outright.
The decline in quality and timeliness is proving to be a significant source of frustration for users, with many Kareo/Tebra complaints mentioning lengthy timelines and unhelpful support.
Training and Onboarding Experience Varies Widely
The onboarding and training process is critical to a practice's success, ultimately shaping their experience with the platform. User feedback for training is mixed. Some reference positive experiences with knowledgeable training managers who offer step-by-step guidance, weekly calls and comprehensive education. However, others are the complete opposite, creating many persistent practice management software issues.
Kareo/Tebra complaints mention trainers doing no more than a single session before abandoning new users. These reviews state they never hear from their trainer ever again. Some users, frustrated with the poor onboarding experience, are told to look things up online, even though they've already gone through those steps after the trainer abandoned them.
This inconsistency is problematic. There's considerable contrast: some praise Tebra's great training experience, while others struggle with zero support. For a platform that's so integral to everyday operations and growth, the lack of consistency creates a spectrum of experiences with Tebra. Those who receive adequate training and onboarding often find the software user-friendly. On the other hand, those who don't struggle with the steep learning curve.
Data Export and Vendor Lock-In Concerns
Data portability is a common complaint in Tebra reviews. Many reviews report that exporting client data from Tebra can be costly and cumbersome. Tebra reportedly doesn't allow users to export client databases in a format that other EMRs don't support. To do so, Tebra purportedly charges a whopping $2,000.
These limitations create a vendor lock-in situation. Switching platforms becomes expensive and complicated. Practices feel trapped. They face practice management software issues they no longer want to deal with, but the costs and headaches of exporting databases prevent them from migrating to another platform. Those data export challenges, paired with customer service quality issues, only compound the frustration.
Technical Issues and Software Stability Problems
According to many Tebra reviews, ongoing technical glitches are impacting everyday operations, costing practices time, money and patients. Common issues include billing errors, system outages and calendar problems. For example, some users report that the software doesn't reflect changes, such as cancelled appointments. Furthermore, new scheduled appointments sometimes don't appear in the system unless staff make repeated attempts.
Many Kareo/Tebra complaints mention overall buggy software. One reviewer went so far as to state that Kareo knew about the existing problems, saw what was happening and could not/would not do anything to fix it. They called it yet another "Kareo glitch."
Clearinghouse issues also exist. Some users complain that the clearinghouse is so unreliable that they've resorted to handling billing tasks directly through insurance portals, all to ensure claims are processed. Additional issues include frequent AWS outages that cause service disruptions and recurring EPCS vendor issues that impact electronic prescription orders.
Billing and Claims Processing Challenges
As with other practice management software issues, there are mixed reviews of billing. On the one hand, some users found Tebra's billing features to be sufficient. Some mention that billing works just fine. However, others experience excessive issues. Several reviewers call Tebra a truly terrible billing platform with poor customer service.
Frequent Kareo/Tebra complaints center on the electronic remittance advance (ERA) not always being processed through the clearinghouse, resulting in delayed payments and additional administrative work. Unfortunately, when those billing issues arise, users face the same Tebra customer service issues we mentioned earlier. That includes excessive response times that ultimately cost practices.
Like many other facets of Tebra, there's a learning curve to the billing features. Some practices manage to operate them efficiently once acclimated. However, others found that successful billing requires a workaround and direct portal access to process claims. These mixed experiences only highlight one of the most common healthcare software complaints: inconsistent performance.
Calendar and Scheduling Functionality Gaps
A functional calendar that syncs in real-time is crucial for maintaining smooth operations. Yet, several Kareo/Tebra complaints reference calendar limitations. Practices report that scheduling more than 10 appointments at a time can be cumbersome, as there's no way to view upcoming appointments without manual review.
Appointments reportedly default to a single service type. Pair that with a lack of mobile friendliness, and staff often struggle to manage even a simple task, such as setting an appointment.
Calendar features should be a home run for practice management software, helping practices streamline their scheduling. However, Tebra reviews state that limitations disrupt scheduling workflows and create unnecessary manual work for administrative teams.
Website and SEO Service Disappointments
Many Kareo/Tebra complaints highlight issues transitioning websites from the former PatientPop platform. A complaint filed with the BBB said the process takes 2 to 3 times as long as it did when PatientPop operated independently. The user reportedly experienced nothing but problems since the merger. The reviewer reported that it was next to impossible to get a hold of anyone who could help. They never resolved the issue, and the user had to pay another company $11,000 to create a new website for their practice.
Tebra also reportedly does nothing to help websites gain traffic. SEO and promotion are nonexistent according to several verified reviews, despite Tebra stating they would help promote practice websites. The drop-off in quality is noticeable. According to one user, PatientPop made more sense and was "awesome" to use 3 years ago. However, since PatientPop and Kareo merged into Tebra, that's no longer the case.
Yet again, inconsistency seems to be a significant concern. Some Tebra reviews say the platform increased website visibility on major search engines and generated a strong online presence that translated into more patients. Meanwhile, others have nothing positive to say about their experiences.
Payment Processing and Med Spa Service Restrictions
We've already mentioned practice management software issues concerning billing. Unfortunately, it doesn't end there. Some users report being unable to use Tebra Payments at all because it lacks support for certain specialty services. For example, some reviewers say they're unable to process payments because they offer Med Spa services. According to Tebra's policy, the platform won't process debit or credit card transactions for Med Spas.
Those restrictions create problems for certain types of practices. Any practice offering services outside traditional medical scopes may find payment processing incompatible. Some Kareo/Tebra complaints say that those terms weren't clear during the sales process, leading to functionality gaps after onboarding. With the high fees and migration hurdles, many practices are stuck.
Sales Process and Expectation Misalignment
For some users, healthcare software complaints revolve around sales tactics and the stark gap between expectations, promises and the harsh realities of using Tebra. Some reviewers accuse Tebra of using misleading sales strategies and communications. Sales teams allegedly offered them a product that's simply not compatible with their practice and business.
Some reviews discovered those incompatibilities and complications long after committing to and paying for Tebra. As a result, they had no choice but to find workarounds as they learned to use the software hands-on. Several reviewers mention feeling deceived by exaggerated claims.
Others find that the software doesn't live up to the promises of coding API or integrating with other systems. Instead, the platform feels outdated. If considering Tebra or any other healthcare software, it's important to do more than look for a list of features you want. Practices should thoroughly test actual workflows during evaluation to ensure platforms meet the mark.
What Works Well: Positive User Feedback
It's not all negative. While complaints about Kareo/Tebra are common, there are plenty of verified reviews that tout many positive aspects of the platform. For example, some report that Tebra is the easiest EMR they have worked on in decades, praising the software's user-friendliness, easy navigation, patient messaging capabilities and streamlined scheduling.
Users also applaud the ability to generate customized reports, the availability of a mobile app and integrated telehealth, which helps practices reduce no-shows. Tebra also gains a point for pricing transparency. Several reviews commend the easy-to-find pricing information and flexible plan options for growing practices.
While there are many Tebra customer service issues you can't ignore, some users found the support teams helpful. When support works well, and users connect with knowledgeable staff, they note how quickly they receive responses and solutions.
Ultimately, experiences vary wildly based on practice needs, specialty, implementation timing, support quality received and other relevant factors.
Consider Alternatives That Specialize In Your Biggest Pain Points
Kareo/Tebra complaints document a pattern of issues with the quality and reliability of customer support, data portability, technical stability and specialty limitations. While every experience is different, we can't ignore verified reviews from real users operating functional medical practices that rely on software like Tebra. Practices must carefully evaluate whether all-in-one platforms like Tebra truly meet their specific needs. In many cases, specialized solutions are a better option for addressing critical workflows.
Reach out to Fuse today to learn more, discuss your practice needs and discover whether specialized tools like Fuse can complement or replace your all-in-one systems.
FAQs
Some of the biggest complaints in Tebra reviews concern lengthy customer support delays, billing issues, payment processing incompatibility, technical issues and poor data portability.
According to many Kareo/Tebra complaints, customer support issues have only worsened since the merger. Feedback is mixed, but many mention prolonged delays, a lack of solutions, unresolved issues and wildly inconsistent quality.
Data export is not easy, and many report limited data portability. When exporting to formats not compatible with other EMRs, exporting is costly and complicated.
There are some limitations on which specialties can use Tebra. For example, per Tebra's policy, practices offering Med Spa services can't use the Tebra Payments features.
Practices must consider factors like workflow compatibility and distinct business needs. While an all-in-one platform may seem compelling, more specialized tools can often meet a practice's needs with fewer limitations and fewer frustrations.







.avif)
.avif)
.avif)

.avif)
.avif)
